Tomasz Berkieta vs Tibo Colson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• On second serve effectiveness, Berkieta slightly outperforms Colson, winning 44.73% of points compared to Colson's 44.12%.
• For return games, Colson has the edge when facing second serves, winning 46.6% of points versus Berkieta’s 44.46%.
• In terms of returning first serves, Berkieta is more effective, securing 25.04% of points, compared to Colson's 22.92%. Could this be the key to unlocking Colson's serve?
• Colson demonstrates better breakpoint resilience, saving 58.9% of opportunities; Berkieta saves 53.08%.
• Over the last 12 months, Colson has a superior win rate of 66.15% compared to Berkieta’s 55.36%. Does this broader success rate predict a victory?
• Colson excels on indoor hard courts with a 66% win rate, while Berkieta prefers clay, winning 51% of matches.
• In terms of competition level, Colson shines with a 71.15% win rate at lower-tier tournaments compared to Berkieta’s 59.62%.
• Berkieta has faced more highly ranked opponents with an average rank of 334.93, whereas Colson's opponents average 445.38. Could this indicate experience against tougher competition?
• If the match stretches to a deciding set, Colson appears more reliable, winning 54% of such scenarios, as opposed to Berkieta's 45%.
• When it comes to converting breakpoints, Berkieta holds a slight advantage, converting 28.91% of the chances against Colson’s 27.43%.

Editorial Prediction (July 12, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performances of both players, several key insights help outline the probable outcomes of the upcoming match. While Berkieta holds a tiny edge in second serve points and breakpoint conversion, these margins are incredibly narrow.

On the defensive side, Colson demonstrates slightly superior resilience in saving breakpoints, which is often crucial in tightly contested matches. This advantage alongside Colson's higher win rate over the past year could tilt the scales.

Furthermore, Colson's strong performance in deciding sets and substantive success on indoor hard surfaces—should this match occur on such a court—positions them favorably against Berkieta’s preference for clay.

Despite Berkieta's experience against stronger opponents, Colson's broader win rate and competent handling of critical points may end up being significant factors. Given these observations, Colson is projected as the likely winner of this faceoff.